🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has announced it is pursuing compensation totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This move constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to decide later this week on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as confiscating European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the new legal action. It has in the past stated it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in European nations are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."